2021 NCAC Volleyball

Conference-Only Statistics


 

Conference Team Leaders

 

HITTING PERCENTAGE S K E TA Pct.
1. Denison 28 411 143 1113 .241
2. Wittenberg 28 370 134 1041 .227
3. Wooster 33 437 196 1229 .196
4. Ohio Wesleyan 33 403 188 1157 .186
5. Hiram 33 352 149 1219 .167
6. Oberlin 33 352 183 1129 .150
7. DePauw 33 361 171 1275 .149
8. Allegheny 32 313 163 1111 .135
9. Kenyon 29 277 167 945 .116
 
Opponent Hitting Pct. S K E TA Pct.
1. Wittenberg 28 278 154 1028 .121
2. Denison 28 285 149 1042 .131
3. DePauw 33 378 184 1280 .152
4. Hiram 33 406 197 1312 .159
5. Ohio Wesleyan 33 373 180 1199 .161
6. Wooster 33 359 155 1117 .183
7. Allegheny 32 427 174 1194 .212
8. Kenyon 29 356 150 938 .220
9. Oberlin 33 414 151 1109 .237
 
ASSISTS S No. Avg/S
1. Denison 28 380 13.57
2. Wittenberg 28 345 12.32
3. Wooster 33 399 12.09
4. Ohio Wesleyan 33 371 11.24
5. DePauw 33 329 9.97
6. Oberlin 33 323 9.79
Hiram 33 323 9.79
8. Allegheny 32 291 9.09
9. Kenyon 29 256 8.83
 
KILLS S No. Avg/S
1. Denison 28 411 14.68
2. Wooster 33 437 13.24
3. Wittenberg 28 370 13.21
4. Ohio Wesleyan 33 403 12.21
5. DePauw 33 361 10.94
6. Oberlin 33 352 10.67
Hiram 33 352 10.67
8. Allegheny 32 313 9.78
9. Kenyon 29 277 9.55
 
BLOCKS S BS BA Total Avg/S
1. DePauw 33 19 101 69.5 2.11
2. Denison 28 22 68 56.0 2.00
3. Allegheny 32 21 85 63.5 1.98
4. Kenyon 29 13 88 57.0 1.97
5. Hiram 33 13 95 60.5 1.83
6. Wittenberg 28 11 72 47.0 1.68
7. Ohio Wesleyan 33 5 96 53.0 1.61
8. Wooster 33 4 84 46.0 1.39
9. Oberlin 33 14 55 41.5 1.26
 
SERVICE ACES S No. Avg/S
1. DePauw 33 75 2.27
2. Hiram 33 72 2.18
3. Wittenberg 28 60 2.14
4. Denison 28 54 1.93
5. Oberlin 33 61 1.85
6. Wooster 33 59 1.79
7. Allegheny 32 49 1.53
8. Ohio Wesleyan 33 47 1.42
9. Kenyon 29 38 1.31
 
DIGS S No. Avg/S
1. Denison 28 530 18.93
2. DePauw 33 619 18.76
3. Wittenberg 28 524 18.71
4. Hiram 33 606 18.36
5. Ohio Wesleyan 33 548 16.61
6. Wooster 33 531 16.09
7. Allegheny 32 486 15.19
8. Oberlin 33 461 13.97
9. Kenyon 29 364 12.55
 

 

Conference Individual Leaders

 

(Players listed below have played in at least 50.00 percent of their team's games.)
 
Hitting % (Min. 3.0 TA/set) Cl S K E TA Pct.
1. Lucy Anderson-Denison JR 28 94 13 182 .445
2. Ashley Haas-DePauw FR 33 49 11 104 .365
3. Tyler Linkhart-Wittenberg FR 28 100 22 230 .339
4. Ava Kutilek-Ohio Wesleyan FR 32 49 13 110 .327
5. Katie Billetdeaux-Wooster SR 33 98 30 246 .276
6. Natalie Buravlov-Ohio Wesleyan FR 22 48 14 124 .274
7. Melissa Murray-Ohio Wesleyan SO 33 90 30 219 .274
8. Cami Sweet-Oberlin FR 30 48 17 119 .261
9. Hayley Nash-Wooster JR 33 142 50 361 .255
10. India McCruter-Allegheny SO 32 47 15 132 .242
 
KILLS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Hayley Nash-Wooster JR 33 142 4.30
2. Daria Rodriguez-Denison FR 28 114 4.07
3. Sophia Sobota-Denison SO 26 97 3.73
4. Eliza Richardson-Ohio Wesleyan JR 27 97 3.59
5. Tyler Linkhart-Wittenberg FR 28 100 3.57
6. Lucy Anderson-Denison JR 28 94 3.36
7. Kiara Franks-Hiram SR 33 105 3.18
8. Kayla Cole-Hiram SR 33 102 3.09
9. Hannah Schartz-Wittenberg FR 28 85 3.04
10. Macy Reimbold-Kenyon 29 88 3.03
 
ASSISTS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Kirby MacKinnon-Denison SO 28 330 11.79
2. Syd Case-Wooster SR 33 348 10.55
3. Taylor Gwynne-Oberlin SO 32 260 8.12
4. Mack Ricketts-Wittenberg JR 24 185 7.71
5. Olivia Osuna-Ohio Wesleyan FR 29 177 6.10
6. Abby Thierauf-Ohio Wesleyan SO 26 142 5.46
7. Emily Chrustic-Hiram JR 33 178 5.39
8. Ashley Brooks-Wittenberg JR 24 127 5.29
9. Olivia D'Andrea-Allegheny SR 32 162 5.06
 
SERVICE ACES Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Lucy Anderson-Denison JR 28 19 0.68
2. Mack Ricketts-Wittenberg JR 24 16 0.67
3. Emma White-DePauw FR 26 15 0.58
4. Mackenzie Brannon-Hiram JR 33 16 0.48
Kayla Cole-Hiram SR 33 16 0.48
6. Meagan Robare-Allegheny FR 29 14 0.48
7. Taylor Gwynne-Oberlin SO 32 14 0.44
8. Mary Landis-Hiram FR 30 13 0.43
9. Sydney Fitzcharles-Wooster JR 33 14 0.42
10. Jenna Purichia-DePauw FR 33 13 0.39
 
BLOCKS Cl S BS BA Total Avg/S
1. Paige Milhon-Kenyon 29 9 30 39.0 1.34
2. India McCruter-Allegheny SO 32 15 22 37.0 1.16
3. Emily Richardson-Hiram FR 33 7 28 35.0 1.06
4. Lauren Ridgway-DePauw SO 33 5 28 33.0 1.00
Lucy Anderson-Denison JR 28 14 14 28.0 1.00
 
DIGS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Jenna Purichia-DePauw FR 33 203 6.15
2. Dakota White-Wittenberg 28 165 5.89
3. Mackenzie Brannon-Hiram JR 33 173 5.24
4. Jenna Corrao-Denison JR 26 130 5.00
5. Moo DeHaro-Oberlin SO 33 150 4.55
6. Sydney Fitzcharles-Wooster JR 33 146 4.42
7. Neah White-Ohio Wesleyan SO 33 130 3.94
8. Katie Hiestand-Wittenberg SO 28 105 3.75
9. Ellie Luciani-Kenyon 29 103 3.55
10. Kayla Cole-Hiram SR 33 114 3.45
 

 

Conference Leaders Versus Opponents

 

HITTING PERCENTAGE BY OPPONENTS S K E TA Pct.
Wittenberg 28 278 154 1028 .121
Denison 28 285 149 1042 .131
DePauw 33 378 184 1280 .152
Hiram 33 406 197 1312 .159
Ohio Wesleyan 33 373 180 1199 .161
Wooster 33 359 155 1117 .183
Allegheny 32 427 174 1194 .212
Kenyon 29 356 150 938 .220
Oberlin 33 414 151 1109 .237
 
KILLS BY OPPONENTS S No. Avg/S
Wittenberg 28 278 9.93
Denison 28 285 10.18
Wooster 33 359 10.88
Ohio Wesleyan 33 373 11.30
DePauw 33 378 11.45
Kenyon 29 356 12.28
Hiram 33 406 12.30
Oberlin 33 414 12.55
Allegheny 32 427 13.34
 
ASSISTS BY OPPONENTS S No. Avg/S
Wittenberg 28 254 9.07
Denison 28 259 9.25
Wooster 33 333 10.09
DePauw 33 339 10.27
Ohio Wesleyan 33 352 10.67
Kenyon 29 320 11.03
Hiram 33 367 11.12
Oberlin 33 385 11.67
Allegheny 32 408 12.75
 
SERVICE ACES BY OPPONENTS S No. Avg/S
Wittenberg 28 28 1.00
Denison 28 31 1.11
Ohio Wesleyan 33 49 1.48
Hiram 33 51 1.55
Wooster 33 55 1.67
Oberlin 33 71 2.15
DePauw 33 71 2.15
Allegheny 32 81 2.53
Kenyon 29 78 2.69
 
BLOCKS BY OPPONENTS S BS BA Total Avg/S
Hiram 33 12 60 42.0 1.27
Allegheny 32 15 73 51.5 1.61
DePauw 33 13 82 54.0 1.64
Wooster 33 17 80 57.0 1.73
Kenyon 29 9 83 50.5 1.74
Ohio Wesleyan 33 17 92 63.0 1.91
Denison 28 7 94 54.0 1.93
Wittenberg 28 14 84 56.0 2.00
Oberlin 33 18 96 66.0 2.00
 
DIGS BY OPPONENTS S No. Avg/S
Kenyon 29 418 14.41
Oberlin 33 493 14.94
Ohio Wesleyan 33 511 15.48
Wooster 33 517 15.67
Wittenberg 28 443 15.82
Denison 28 461 16.46
Allegheny 32 551 17.22
Hiram 33 637 19.30
DePauw 33 638 19.33